Market size estimates, developer adoption, model downloads, hiring and search demand - measured, sourced, and refreshed monthly.
Ethora Research · Last updated 2026-09-02 · Data snapshot: August 2026 · CC BY 4.0 - free to reuse with attribution
Most conversational AI statistics circulating online are copies of copies. This page is different: the majority of the numbers below are primary measurements taken for The State of Conversational AI, Q3 2026 (Ethora Research) - GitHub stars, package downloads, Hugging Face pulls, search demand, open-job counts and LinkedIn talent counts - each linking to its full dataset. Market-size figures come from the named analyst houses. Data snapshot: August 2026; page reviewed monthly.
No two analyst houses define the conversational-AI market the same way, so estimates vary widely - we report them side by side rather than picking one. The consensus shape: a market in the low-to-mid tens of billions today, growing at roughly 20-26% a year.
| Analyst house | Base estimate | Forecast | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grand View Research | $14.29B (2025) | $41.39B by 2030 | 23.7% |
| MarketsandMarkets | $17.05B (2025) | $49.80B by 2031 | 19.6% |
| Fortune Business Insights | $17.97B (2026) | $82.46B by 2034 | 21.0% |
| Research and Markets | $17.12B (2026) | - | 25.6% |
Conversational AI market size estimates by analyst house (retrieved September 2026).

Figure. Open developer attention by GitHub stars, top tracked conversational-AI projects (Aug 2026).
Open developer attention concentrates at the two ends of the stack: running models on your own infrastructure (Ollama, llama.cpp, vLLM) and wiring them together (orchestration frameworks and the new protocol layer). Stars measure developer mindshare, not production usage - install counts below sharpen the picture.
| Project | Layer | GitHub stars |
|---|---|---|
| ollama/ollama | Serving | 178,535 |
| langflow-ai/langflow | Orchestration | 153,239 |
| langgenius/dify | Orchestration | 152,436 |
| open-webui/open-webui | Interface | 148,767 |
| langchain-ai/langchain | Orchestration | 144,246 |
| ggml-org/llama.cpp | Serving | 123,903 |
| modelcontextprotocol/servers | Agents / Protocol | 89,561 |
| vllm-project/vllm | Serving | 89,044 |
| lobehub/lobe-chat | Interface | 81,690 |
| Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm | Interface | 64,705 |
Most-starred conversational-AI projects, Aug 2026. Full 34-project dataset: github-adoption-2026-08.
Monthly package downloads (Aug 2026): LiteLLM ~744M (PyPI), openai ~432M (PyPI), mcp ~339M (PyPI), langchain ~279M (PyPI), @modelcontextprotocol/sdk ~198M (npm), @anthropic-ai/sdk ~117M (npm). Full table: SDK downloads dataset.
By 30-day Hugging Face downloads, Qwen (112.8M) and Gemma (97.1M) lead, ahead of Llama (29.0M), DeepSeek (19.4M) and Phi (18.8M). By likes - a mindshare signal - the order flips: DeepSeek (33,128), Llama (27,319), Kimi (20,133) and Mistral (18,762) lead while Qwen sits far lower. There are two different "leading" open models depending on whether you measure what people run or what people love. Full table: open-weight LLM dataset.
Licensing matters: Cohere's Command family is non-commercial, Mistral's newest flagships are research-only unless licensed, and Llama and Gemma carry custom terms with real restrictions. Details: licence dataset.

Figure. Three-year US search-volume trend for headline category terms. Volumes are third-party estimates.
US search for "ai agents" rose roughly 700-fold since early 2023 (about 60 to ~50,000 monthly searches) and now leads the category's vocabulary. "mcp server" had effectively zero volume before late 2024 and reached tens of thousands of monthly searches within about eighteen months. "rag" doubled and then plateaued into assumed infrastructure, and "self hosted llm" climbs steadily. 24 of the 28 tracked buying terms trigger a Google AI Overview. Full 28-term dataset with 3-year trends: search demand dataset.
The demand side (open AI/LLM roles, Aug 2026): the United States leads at ~301,000 open roles (~900 per million people); India ~36,000; United Kingdom ~18,000; Canada ~12,000. Per capita, Singapore leads at ~1,134 open AI roles per million. The supply side (LinkedIn-visible core AI/ML engineers): US ~112,000 and India ~95,000 dominate absolute supply, while per capita Singapore (~876/million) leads again, ahead of the UAE (410), Switzerland (407) and Ireland (348).
| Country | Open AI/LLM roles | Per million people |
|---|---|---|
| United States | ~301,000 | 900 |
| India | ~36,000 | 25 |
| United Kingdom | ~18,000 | 266 |
| Canada | ~12,000 | 301 |
| Germany | ~8,600 | 103 |
| Singapore | ~6,800 | 1,134 |
| Australia | ~4,700 | 182 |
| France | ~3,600 | 53 |
| Netherlands | ~1,650 | 92 |
Open AI/LLM roles by country, Aug 2026. Keyword counts overlap, so totals are directional. Full matrix: jobs demand dataset.
Setting demand against supply: the US runs about 2.7 open roles per core practitioner (a talent importer), Singapore 1.3 and the UK 1.1; India (0.4), France (0.3) and the Netherlands (0.3) are net talent exporters. Talent detail: talent dataset.
On Freelancer.com, AI projects are overwhelmingly small and fixed-price: a median advertised budget around $250 (hourly work ~$14/hr), dominated by chatbot-integration and automation gigs. On Upwork, across ~100 open AI chatbot and LLM listings (Aug 2026), over 95% of postings are hourly at a median ~$30/hour (middle half $24-$40), skewing Expert and Intermediate. Serious conversational-AI capability is hired in-house or on skilled contracts; low-end implementation has commoditised into offshore piecework. Full data: freelance market dataset.
Ethora Research. (2026). Conversational AI Statistics 2026: Market Size, Adoption, Jobs and Search Demand. Retrieved from https://ethora.com/research/statistics/conversational-ai-statistics/
Most figures come from The State of Conversational AI, Q3 2026 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22131590), released under CC BY 4.0 with open data and collection scripts at github.com/dappros/state-of-conversational-ai. Every statistic above links to its dataset or named external source. Methodology: measurement notes.Numbers are point-in-time snapshots and interest proxies, not revenue or market share: stars and downloads measure developer attention and pulls, search volumes are third-party estimates, and job/talent counts are keyword- and LinkedIn-based with stated limits. See the methodology page for each metric's caveats.